In my business compass course, we
were asked to describe Disney as best as possible. Connecting with our
childhood, many of us listed words such as “magical, imaginative and entrancing.”
Oftentimes, the sentimental connection with Disney causes us to forget that Disney
isn’t just a mystical movie maker, but a mass media giant. Being one of the six
mega corporations that own a majority of the media market today, Disney has
always had an influence over what gets depicted and how they go about doing so.
Throughout their animated career, Disney has been under fire for wrongly portraying
cultures in their movies. By utilizing the magic bullet and cultural studies
perspectives, we can pinpoint these controversial aspects of Disney and uncover
any implications they may have had.
The magic bullet perspective is
based off of the basis that direct contact with the media can influence
thoughts and actions. Children learn from watching movies, whether what the
movie is portraying is true or not. They can imitate whatever the main
characters do, wear and act and also develop wrong attitudes about certain
groups. Nancy Eldridge related that many of the children who visit the Plimoth
Plantation believe that all Native Americans acted the way they did in Peter Pan and “hit their faces and go ‘woo woo
woo’, wear headdresses with lots of feathers and sit cross-legged with their
arms folded.” Jacqueline Maloney told a story where her friend’s son, after
watching the Lion King, connected a group of African American children to the
hyenas in the movie. Because the hyenas had voices similar to those of African
Americans and were villainous, the son believed these kids to be the same. Kids
developed mindsets based on what they have seen in the movies and continued to
believe them until someone spoke to them explaining what is right and wrong.
Cultural studies perspective relies
on the preconceived notion that there may be a stereotype already in place.
People are reinforced about these through the films and can either accept or
resist them. Dr. Gail Dines noted that “scripts are written by real people” and
they relate what they believe to be the norms into their writings. Doctor Alvin
Pouissant believed that the film Tarzan promoted white supremacy by having the
gorillas in Africa who are connected instead of African Americans. When viewed
by kids in Africa, they may believe that this means they are being degraded.
Since there are no Africans present in their own continent, they are believed
to be on the same level as gorillas who take their place and that the Whites
have all the power. Latinos are also depicted unfairly, according to Marisa
Peralta. Marisa Peralta stated that it’s insulting that the Latino race are
depicted through Pedro in Lady and the Tramp and that he is continuously found doing
things he isn't supposed to such as steal a car. Pedro is also insulted and
degraded by a good looking dog, but is still entranced by the looks of her and
all the previous insults don’t affect him. By tying these examples to what Dr.
Dines said, there must have been some type of stereotype within society that
caused these writers to portray or exclude certain cultures in the way they
did.
Your piece is very unique in the introduction with the use of your own personal experience. This made me think deeper into the Disney immoralities by making me also put myself into the position of a Disney viewer. I was also tricked as a kid into ignoring these stereotypes and only focusing on the entertainment purposes of Disney.
ReplyDeleteWhen I viewed the Mickey Mouse Monopoly documentary, I did not notice the Magic Bullet perspective like you did. It is clearly apparent in the Disney movies and I missed it. This is a good job of showing the direct effects that Disney stereotypes have on the viewers. I, personally, focused more on the cultivation perspective. The images and messages of these movies are direct, but I found that they seemed more apparent when children are exposed to similar stereotypes over multiple movies, causing a cumulative effect on the children.
I was a little offended when you talked about the Chihuahua in “Lady and the Tramp”. Only because this dog is actually from Oliver And Company and his name is Tito. Sorry, but I’m a big fan of that movie. But now that that is off of my chest I can say that I agreed completely with the cultural studies perspective being seen in this documentary. I also wrote on the pre-existing stereotypes being reinforced by Disney through the use of African American animals and such stereotypes.
I agree with Shawn and was very interested in your take on the Mickey Mouse Monopoly. I found the same two perspectives, but did not find nearly the same useful examples to prove my point. The evidence you provide is very well presented and gave the audience, including me, the ability to really reflect upon the perspective that you believe was displayed throughout the video. I also did not noticed the examples you presented in your cultural studies paragraph. I had to rely on other examples and some personal experience with Disney to relate the information to the audience. Overall, I really liked the views that you presented because you saw the same perspectives that I noticed, but were able to present other examples that were evidence of the perspectives.
ReplyDelete